Articles

 

Simplifying Performance Metrics: The Consultant's Perspective on Introducing the "Contribution" KPI

 

Introduction

As a consultant brought in to address the performance metric challenges faced by an asset finance company, I identified a critical issue: the existing KPIs of volume (sales) and margin (yield less cost of funds) were not fully capturing the profitability of the business. Despite achieving these KPIs, the profit performance was not aligning with expectations. This discrepancy was largely due to two overlooked factors: commissions paid to intermediaries and the duration of finance agreements.

Identifying the Problem

During my initial assessment, it became evident that the existing performance metrics were not effectively capturing the full picture of profitability. The complexity of the business dynamics, including the variety of finance products, industries, markets, and asset types, was creating significant challenges.

Confusion Among Account Managers

Account managers were primarily focused on achieving volume (sales) and margin (yield less cost of funds) KPIs. However, these metrics did not account for the full range of factors influencing profitability, such as the commissions paid to intermediaries and the varying durations of finance agreements. This oversight led to several issues:

Lack of Visibility: Account managers lacked visibility into how their efforts impacted the company's overall profitability. They could see their sales and margins but had no clear understanding of how these translated into net profit after considering commissions and agreement durations.

Misaligned Incentives: The existing KPIs incentivised behaviours that did not necessarily align with the company's profitability goals. For example, focusing solely on high-volume sales without considering the cost of commissions or the long-term profitability of shorter agreements.

Frustration and Disengagement: The disconnect between their efforts and the financial outcomes led to frustration among account managers. They felt their hard work was not adequately reflected in the company's profit performance, leading to disengagement and reduced motivation.

Challenges for the FP&A Team

The Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A) team faced its own set of challenges:

Complex Explanations: Explaining the financial outcomes to account managers was a complex task. The FP&A team had to break down the impact of various factors, such as commissions and agreement durations, which were not directly visible in the volume and margin KPIs.

Communication Gaps: The complexity of these explanations often resulted in communication gaps. Account managers struggled to grasp the full picture, leading to misunderstandings and further frustration.

Inefficient Reporting: The existing reporting tools and metrics were not equipped to provide a comprehensive view of profitability. This inefficiency made it difficult for the FP&A team to present a clear and cohesive financial story.

The Need for a Comprehensive Metric

It became clear that a more holistic approach was needed to bridge the gap between account managers' efforts and the company's profitability. The introduction of a single, comprehensive metric— the "Contribution" KPI—was proposed to address these issues. This new KPI would incorporate volume, margin, duration, and commissions into a single monetary value, providing a clearer and more accurate measure of profitability.

By focusing on the Contribution KPI, the company aimed to:

Enhance Visibility: Provide account managers with a clear understanding of how their activities impact overall profitability.

Align Incentives: Ensure that the KPIs incentivise behaviours that align with the company's financial goals.

Improve Communication: Simplify the financial story, making it easier for the FP&A team to explain and for account managers to understand.

 

In summary, the initial assessment highlighted the need for a more comprehensive performance metric to address the confusion and frustration among account managers and the communication challenges faced by the FP&A team. The introduction of the Contribution KPI was a strategic move to simplify performance metrics and enhance the overall understanding of profitability within the company.

 

The Solution: Introducing the Contribution KPI

To address the challenges of accurately measuring profitability and aligning incentives, I proposed the introduction of a single, comprehensive metric: the "Contribution" KPI. This new KPI was designed to provide a holistic view of an agreement's profitability by integrating several key factors into a single monetary value (£). Here’s a detailed breakdown of how each component contributes to this comprehensive measure:

Volume: The Total Sales Generated

Volume represents the total sales generated by an account manager. It is a fundamental metric that indicates the scale of business being brought in. However, on its own, volume does not account for the profitability of these sales. By including volume in the Contribution KPI, we ensure that the scale of business is considered, but it is balanced by other factors that affect profitability.

Margin: The Yield Less the Cost of Funds

Margin is a critical component that reflects the profitability of sales after accounting for the cost of funds. It provides insight into how efficiently the company is generating profit from its sales. By incorporating margin into the Contribution KPI, we ensure that account managers are incentivised not just to generate sales, but to focus on high-margin deals that contribute more significantly to the company's bottom line.

Duration: The Length of the Finance Agreement

The duration of a finance agreement impacts long-term profitability. Longer agreements can provide steady income over time, but they also carry risks and costs associated with maintaining the agreement. Shorter agreements might bring quicker returns but may not contribute as much to long-term stability. By including duration in the Contribution KPI, we capture the long-term value and risks associated with each agreement, encouraging account managers to consider the optimal length of agreements for sustained profitability.

Commissions: Payments Made to Intermediaries

Commissions paid to intermediaries can significantly affect net profit. High commission costs can erode the profitability of even high-volume and high-margin deals. By factoring commissions into the Contribution KPI, we ensure that account managers are aware of the impact of these costs and are incentivised to negotiate more favourable commission structures or seek deals with lower commission rates.

Integrating the Factors into a Single Monetary Value (£)

By integrating volume, margin, duration, and commissions into a single monetary value, the Contribution KPI offers a clearer and more comprehensive measure of profitability. This holistic approach provides several benefits:

Simplified Performance Measurement: Account managers can easily see the overall profitability of their efforts in a single figure, making it easier to understand and act upon.

Balanced Incentives: The Contribution KPI balances the need for high sales volume with the importance of profitability, long-term value, and cost management.

Enhanced Decision-Making: With a comprehensive view of profitability, account managers can make more informed decisions about which deals to pursue and how to structure agreements.

Improved Communication: The FP&A team can more effectively communicate financial outcomes and drivers of profitability, reducing confusion and fostering better alignment with the company's financial goals.

In summary, the introduction of the Contribution KPI represents a strategic shift towards a more holistic and accurate measure of profitability. By incorporating volume, margin, duration, and commissions into a single metric, the company can better align incentives, improve decision-making, and enhance overall financial performance.

 

Implementation and Benefits

Implementation Process

The successful implementation of the Contribution KPI involved several key steps to ensure that both account managers and the FP&A team were well-prepared and supported throughout the transition.

Training Sessions:

Objective: To ensure that account managers fully understood the new Contribution KPI and its implications for their performance evaluation.

Approach: Comprehensive training sessions were conducted, covering the rationale behind the new metric, how it is calculated, and its impact on their day-to-day activities. These sessions included interactive workshops, real-life examples, and Q&A segments to address any concerns or queries.

Outcome: Account managers gained a clear understanding of the Contribution KPI, how it integrates volume, margin, duration, and commissions, and how it would influence their performance targets.

Reporting Tools:

Objective: To develop effective tools for tracking and communicating Contribution performance.

Approach: New reporting tools and dashboards were created to provide real-time insights into the Contribution KPI. These tools were designed to be user-friendly, with visual aids such as graphs and charts to help account managers easily interpret their performance data.

Outcome: The new reporting tools enabled account managers to monitor their Contribution performance continuously, facilitating better decision-making and strategic planning.

Ongoing Support:

Objective: To provide continuous support to ensure a smooth transition and address any ongoing challenges.

Approach: A support system was established, including regular check-ins, feedback sessions, and a dedicated helpdesk for any technical or conceptual issues. The FP&A team also provided periodic updates and refresher training to keep everyone aligned with the new KPI.

Outcome: Continuous support ensured that both account managers and the FP&A team felt confident and capable in using the Contribution KPI, leading to a smoother and more effective implementation process.

Benefits of the Contribution KPI

The introduction of the Contribution KPI brought several significant benefits, enhancing the overall performance evaluation process and aligning the company's financial goals.

Holistic Performance Evaluation:

Benefit: The Contribution KPI allowed for a more nuanced assessment of account managers' performance by considering all relevant financial aspects—volume, margin, duration, and commissions.

Impact: This holistic approach provided a more accurate reflection of each account manager's contribution to the company's profitability, leading to fairer and more comprehensive performance evaluations.

Enhanced Clarity:

Benefit: With a single, comprehensive metric, the FP&A team could more easily explain the financial outcomes.

Impact: This clarity reduced confusion among account managers, improved communication, and fostered a better understanding of how their activities impacted the company's financial health.

Better Alignment with Financial Goals:

Benefit: Account managers could see a direct link between their activities and the company's profitability.

Impact: This alignment encouraged more strategic decision-making, as account managers were incentivised to pursue deals that maximised the Contribution KPI, thereby supporting the company's long-term financial objectives.

Motivation and Engagement:

Benefit: Clearer performance metrics helped account managers understand their impact on the company's success.

Impact: This understanding boosted motivation and engagement, as account managers felt more connected to the company's goals and more recognised for their contributions.

In summary, the implementation of the Contribution KPI was a strategic move that streamlined performance metrics, improved clarity, and enhanced the overall understanding of profitability within the company. This comprehensive approach not only simplified the performance evaluation process but also fostered a more cohesive and motivated team, driving the company towards its financial goals.

 

Impact and Results

Since the introduction of the Contribution KPI, the company has experienced a significant transformation in the clarity and effectiveness of its performance metrics. This new metric has provided a comprehensive view of profitability, integrating volume, margin, duration, and commissions into a single, understandable figure. Here are the key impacts and results observed:

Improved Clarity and Effectiveness

The Contribution KPI has greatly enhanced the clarity of performance metrics. Account managers now have a clear and direct understanding of how their efforts translate into the company's financial success. This clarity has demystified the previously complex relationship between their activities and the overall profitability, making it easier for them to align their strategies with the company's financial goals.

Enhanced Communication

For the FP&A team, the Contribution KPI has simplified the communication of financial outcomes. By consolidating multiple factors into one comprehensive metric, the FP&A team can more effectively explain the drivers of profitability. This has reduced confusion and improved the overall quality of financial discussions, fostering a better understanding among all stakeholders.

Strategic Decision-Making

With a clearer understanding of how their actions impact profitability, account managers are now making more strategic decisions. They are better equipped to evaluate the long-term value of agreements, considering not just the immediate sales and margins but also the duration and commission costs. This strategic approach has led to more profitable and sustainable business practices.

Increased Motivation and Engagement

The introduction of the Contribution KPI has also had a positive effect on the motivation and engagement of account managers. By providing a clear and comprehensive measure of their impact, account managers feel more connected to the company's success. This has boosted their motivation and engagement, leading to higher levels of performance and job satisfaction.

Overall Financial Performance

The streamlined performance metrics have contributed to a more cohesive and motivated team, driving the company towards its financial goals. The holistic view provided by the Contribution KPI ensures that all relevant factors are considered, leading to more accurate and insightful performance assessments. This strategic move has not only simplified the performance evaluation process but also enhanced the overall understanding of profitability within the company.

 

Conclusion

As a consultant, it has been immensely rewarding to witness the positive impact of the Contribution KPI on both the account managers and the FP&A team. The introduction of this comprehensive metric has streamlined performance metrics, improved clarity, and fostered a more cohesive and motivated team. This strategic change has driven the company towards its financial goals, ensuring a more sustainable and profitable future.

 

Disclaimer

The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information, we make no guarantees regarding its reliability or suitability for any specific purpose. Financial decisions should not be based solely on the information provided herein. We recommend consulting with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment or financial decisions. Greddf Limited accepts no liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of this information. All rights reserved.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright 2024 G R E D D F Publications

 

 
Mark Campbell-Blake